Separate the investment split from revenue sharing. Use a proposal based on an actual venue assessment to guide your decision.
Start with your venue's readiness
The suitable model depends on your venue: its space, players, operating team and goals for the new service. This helps CapCourt assess an approach suited to actual use, rather than selecting from a model's name or a single cost item.
Before the conversation, write down what you want players to gain and which tasks your venue is ready to handle, such as providing space or introducing the service. Clear responsibilities make proposals easier to compare.
Model 1: Venue-funded installation
The venue pays for equipment and system installation. CapCourt charges a 10% revenue share, or GP, and a monthly platform fee of THB 999. Equipment belongs to the venue under the contract terms. These are CapCourt's stated terms for this model.
Ask which equipment and installation work the proposal includes, what system support covers and how equipment ownership is defined. The installation budget still needs assessment for your venue. The monthly platform fee isn't the entire installation cost.
Model 2: 50:50 co-investment
The venue and CapCourt invest 50% each. There is no monthly platform fee, and revenue sharing is agreed together according to suitability. The model is intended for high-potential venues with an established player base, with details assessed jointly.
A 50:50 investment split does not automatically mean a 50:50 revenue split. Keep these two subjects separate and confirm the investment items, each party's responsibilities and revenue sharing clearly in the proposal.
Model 3: CapCourt-funded installation
CapCourt funds system installation. The venue provides space and supports operations, with GP revenue sharing agreed together. This suits suitable venues seeking a new service without funding installation themselves.
Funding is subject to a suitability assessment. Ask what space and operational support are needed, along with service conditions and revenue sharing. Confirm any detail not stated in the model information directly with the team.
Compare responsibilities as well as costs
Read a proposal in three parts: who invests in what, who handles each task, and how revenue sharing and service fees work. Check whether all three fit your venue's operation and the experience you want to offer players.
Agree on what GP means, which revenue is used for its calculation, how records are reconciled and how issues are handled. This article explains the models using CapCourt's information; it doesn't calculate returns or promise a payback period.
Information that makes the first conversation useful
Prepare your venue name, location, court count, sports, booking system and preferred model. If you're unsure, choose “I'd like the team's recommendation.” The team can then survey the site and propose installation, budget and partnership options.
The first conversation should establish a shared understanding of the space and service scope. Before deciding, obtain a proposal you can read and check, with core services, Beta features and features under development clearly identified.
This AI-authored article introduces the service and user experience at a high level. Confirm service details and availability for your venue with CapCourt before use.